EU AI Act Implementation: France Still Without Designated National Competent Authorities

On September 9, 2025, theย Directorate-General for Enterprisesย (DGE) of the Frenchย Ministry of the Economy, Finance and Industrial, Energy and Digital Sovereigntyย published aย draft designationย of marketย surveillance authorities (MSAs) designated under theย EU AI Act. This draft designation establishes a governance framework which, given the profusion of MSAs designated and numerous shared responsibilities involved, can be considered complex. It should be noted, however, that this draft does not create any new authorities, which means that most operators will refer to their usual regulators.

French-Market-Surveillance-Authorities-
French Market Surveillance Organisation in English.

Overview of the market surveillance organisation under the EU AI Act in France

In France, seventeen authorities would be designated as MSAs. Among them, three would be responsible for overseeing the majority of AI use cases:

  • The CNIL, French data protection authority (Commission Nationale de lโ€™Informatique et des Libertรฉs) with 15 AI use cases.
  • The DGCCRF, French directorate-general for competition, consumer affairs and fraud control (Direction Gรฉnรฉrale de la Concurrence, de la Consommation et de la Rรฉpression des Fraudes) with 14 AI use cases.
  • The ARCOM, French regulatory authority for audiovisual and digital communication (Autoritรฉ de Rรฉgulation de la COMmunication Audiovisuelle et Numรฉrique) with 7 AI use cases. 

It should be noted that when the DGCCRF and ARCOM receive AI use cases to oversee, they would almost always share them with at least one other authority. This situation would require a clear division of responsibilities between the MSAs from an administrative perspective, as well as enhanced coordination from an operational perspective to avoid overlap or duplication of tasks. The remaining MSAs are generally already designated as MSAs under other regulations, with one to three AI use cases to oversee per authority.

A tandem coordination would be established between the DGE on strategic aspects and the DGCCRF on operational aspects. It is also planned that these two directorates will sit on the AI Board:

  • TheDGE is expected to be designated as the State representative on the AI Board (art. 65 of the EU AI Act).
  • The DGCCRF is expected to be designated as the representative of the MSAs in the permanent sub-group for the cooperation and exchanges among MSAs and notifying authorities of the AI Board (art. 65 of the EU AI Act).

In addition, aย pool of shared technical expertise, drawing onย ANSSIย (National Agency for Information System Security) andย PEReNย (Center of Expertise for digital platform regulation), would be set up to support the MSAs in their tasks of overseeing the compliance of AI systems. This system would provide uniform access to technical expertise for all authorities, thereby addressing recruitment difficulties in the face of a potential talent shortage or limited budgets, and centralising expertise.

Current Status of the Official Designation of Market Surveillance Authorities in France

However, thisย project is still awaiting approvalย byย Parliament.ย Initially, the bill containing various provisions for adaptation to European Union law, known as theย DDADUE Bill of November 2025ย (‘projet de loi Ddadue de novembre 2025‘), contained provisions toย adapt French lawย to theย EU AI Actย andย formalise the designation of national competent authorities.[1]ย [2]ย The provisions concerning the designation of national competent authorities were later withdrawn from the bill submitted to Parliament.[3]ย 

Thus, we currently have no information concerning the formalisation of this designation in France.

France’s approach regarding the designation of its national competent authorities

To conclude, France seems to have opted for decentralised market surveillance organisation, based on authorities already identified by operators, with coordination led by the Ministry of the Economy and centralised provision of the technical expertise required for the conformity assessment tasks carried out by the MSAs.

However, despite the publication of the draft designation of MSAs, the progress of the implementation of theย EU AI Actย in France is unclear and particularly delayed. France is still one of the States that has not yet designated its national competent authorities more than five months after the deadline set by theย EU AI Actย on August 2, 2025.


To stay informed about the next bills from the EU Member States to implement the EU AI Act, visit our website at AI-Regulation.com and follow us on LinkedInTwitter and Facebook.

S.P


[1] Not to be confused with the Law on various provisions for adaptation to European Union law of 30 April 2025, also known as the DDADUE Law of April 2025 (loi Ddadue du 30 avril 2025).

[2] French Senate. (2025). Dossier lรฉgislatif – Projet de loi portant diverses dispositions d’adaptation au droit de l’Union europรฉenne en matiรจre รฉconomique, financiรจre, environnementale, รฉnergรฉtique, d’information, de transport, de santรฉ, d’agriculture et de pรชche. [Legislative dossier – Draft law containing various provisions adapting to European Union law in the areas of economics, finance, the environment, energy, information, transport, health, agriculture and fisheries]. French Senate. Available at: https://www.senat.fr/dossier-legislatif/pjl25-118.html.

[3] Contexte. (2025). Pressรฉe par les dรฉlais de transposition, la France finira de rรฉguler lโ€™IA plus tard. [Pressed by transposition deadlines, France will finish regulating AI later]. Contexte. Available at: https://www.contexte.com/fr/actualite/tech/document-contexte-pressee-par-les-delais-de-transposition-la-france-finira-de-reguler-lia-plus-tard_241050.

Like this article?
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share by Email